Japanese Colonialism Was no Different to Western Colonialism Essay

Japanese Colonialism Was no Different to Western Colonialism - Essay ExampleAlthough, Japanese and British compoundism took wander during the same period, their colonial policies were quite different in some aspects while similar in other. The major(ip) areas in which Japan and Britain formed its colonies were significantly different. The regions where the Japanese were the most dominant in their colonial influence are Korea, Taiwan and Philippines. Whereas the British rule was prevalent in Africa and the Indian subcontinent. Their policies seemed significantly different in some aspects, yet somehow similar in others. The basic difference in the policies of these colonial powers was their object lens of colonization. The colonization by Japanese aimed at extending the Japanese empire in various parts of the world. Whereas the British aimed to give independence to its colonies whenever the need arises. Their policies relating to jurisprudences, rule and regulations and economic de velopment were significantly different. In areas of managing cultural sort and fosterage, their policies were quite similar. Japanese wanted to rule its colonies directly while the British alivenessed the idea of validating rule. In Africa, British let the African leaders to carry out their judicial and executive functions with the support of British officials. The British were in favor of indirect rule as they did non have to overtake money in order to recreate the constitutional framework and hiring and firing of government employees. By permit the native leaders to continue carrying their functions, the British were able to save manpower and money. They gave a high gradation of autonomy and strength to native authorities. In areas where there was one ethnic group, the local customary laws seemed to work. In areas where there were many ethnic groups, the British made councils which were made up of the natives who were the educated elite. These councils were in the direct ion of British. It seemed that British were more interested in reaping the economic benefits from the region rather than in governing it (Kenneth A. Schultz and horse parsley Lee). On the other hand, the Japanese installed new governments in which the governor generals were in charge of controlling the law and accommodating the needs of the native Koreans and Taiwanese. The legal system was extremely discriminatory against native populations in the colonies. Koreans ,who had gained education could participate in government, were given fewer rights than Japanese. The natives did not have the same level of protection chthonian Japanese law as the Japanese did and were not given the right to elect their government. This kind of variation was practiced in order to make the colonial subjects so weak that they are unable to insurgent against the colonial powers. Later the education system was also designed as such that the colonial subjects were not provided that level of education whi ch would lead to a rebellion or at least empowerment of the colonial subjects. The Japanese aimed to have a controlled empire which would be controlled from Tokyo and the laws would be no different from those which govern the original Japanese nation. Initially, the local laws were kept intact and the Supreme court in Japan had no control over those in Taiwan and Korea. The impression was given that the judiciary will remain supreme of the parent companys laws. In reality, this initiative was just taken in order to promote the support of