Issues in the Mock Negotiation Problem Essay

Being a member of the Local 5000 in this exclusively interpret I could point tabu numerous things that make the employees at auto Products Corporation wish things better. There seems to be issues at the capital of Indiana plant concerning over cartridge holder, premium pay, and stock-still sub necessitateing instead of using their suffer employees to do the wreak. What I maintain withal gotten from this mock negotiation is that in the past, the union and counsel have been satis actory.Different viewpointsI have not had a very dear(p) experience with my police squadmates on this project. I agree that this shouldve been a fun project scarce it has been very stressful to me. As far as different viewpoints I flavor again as though Ive done this whole project by myself because everything I posted the only response I received about of the time is sounds good, I agree, good idea. I could go on and on about how my views differed from my teammates or how I feel wish I had no second in the negotiation. I similarly feel as though I played the role of secretary and chairperson in this project but overall I am satisfied with the final results on our issues raised(a) to perplexity.Research ProvidedResearch was provided for my team by me concerning the current agedity clause, required overtime, and the issues concerning the associations objurgate to subcontract. The union wanted to scotch to the current higher status clause, which management agreed, because it isnt fair that junior employees can come in ahead a senior at the play on to take the place of a business sector when a senior employee is qualified to fill the position. I provided the following explore to my team from the textbook In many contracts, seniority governs promotions when a senior employee is qualified to fill the position in question. Under others, seniority becomes the determining factor in promotions when the senior has the ability for the job in question equal to that of a ll other employees who whitethorn desire the better job.(Text page359) Sticking with the current seniority clause impart ensure that positions are alter properly. as well as, in the Mock Negotiation it states that the beau monde has the secure to require overtime in the existing contract but in that respect was an issue raised by the employees that the supervisor isnt fair and that they have been large their friends the opportunity to earn the extra money and discriminating against the other employees. For this issue I provided the following research from the textbook The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 places no restriction on employees to ca-ca much than 40 hours in a drawweek, other than the employees who acetify more than 40 hours must be paid at least one and one-half times their regular rate of pay for all hours in excess of 40 hours. The textbook also states that when a supervisor makes an error in the regard of offering his/her friends to work overtime and discri minating others the employer may be faced with a grievance filed by the employee and take in for the summation of money he/she would have earned if he/she wouldve worked.Also, the situation of paying for the same work doubly at overtime rates.(text pages288-290) This could be a major disaster if the company doesnt fix this and if it isnt and thence many possible grievances can still be filed. On the issues concerning the companys right to subcontract, in the negotiation it stated that for many years each skilled tradesperson has worked only within his or her trade and five months ago the company required a auto-mechanic to do a job normally performed by a plumber. A grievance was filed and the arbitrator sustained the position of the union on the basis of the past practice principle. I provided the following research from the textbook for my team The union should want the the company add a subcontracting particle in the push back agreement.The textbook gives an example of a s ubcontracting section in a labor agreement that states whenever the company contemplates contracting out any type of work normally performed by a maintenance employees, it shall inform the President, Chairman, and Grievance charge and the affected Shop flight attendant of its intentions prior to making a decision to award the contract.(text page389)This would be great considering for many years the company had each skilled tradeperson works only within his or her trade.When the company required a mechanic for a job that normally was performed by a plumber the employee and union filed a grievance. The company should joint with past practice and continue to keep their tradepeople working only within his or her trade. If not then workrightspress.com states that stewards can do the following Past practices grievances are well suited for group action. Unions can promote numbers of workers to file grievances on the matter Distribute leaflets about the dis drope Circulate petitions Hol d meetings during breaks lookout man before or later on work or during breaks (being sure not to interfere with employees, suppliers, or shippers) Also in the textbook, the example also states that the union retains the right to examine any existing or late subcontracting agreement for the purposes of checking wage scales and the specific work contracted.(text page389) These are great things we could put in the subcontracting section of the labor agreement. Also in the subcontracting section in the labor agreement, I think the union should also ask that limitations be put in place such as 1. Requiring the employer to have an agreement that subcontractors will be used only on special occasions ( where specialized equipment that isnt on company set forth is required or where special skills are needed )2. No-layoff guarantees to current employees (as in no employee of any patronage, which craft is being utilized by an outside contractor, shall be laid off as long as the outside co ntractor is in the plant doing work that employees in such craft are equal to do. 3. Provisions giving the union veto power over any or all subcontracting 4. Requirements that the management prove to the union that time, expense, or facility considerations prevent it from stick outing current employees to perform the work. (text page388)The Local 5000 Union Demands after(prenominal) reading the Mock Negotiation the union decided on the following demands mainly on the issues raised in the negotiation. The union has developed the following demands concerning the Mock Negotiation at Auto Products Corporation for the Indianapolis plant 1. The union will not permit any change in the checkup exam insurance program. The union wants to fight for better benefit packages, which would include a 401K and also better medical checkup insurances. In the current contract, the medical insurance program does not cover employees that are laid off for more than 30 consecutive days and 80% of the employees laid off, have been laid off for longer than 30 consecutive days.We would like to ask that management remove this and also still cover the employees on layoff, visits to physician offices, hospitals, and emergency rooms up to 60 days. 2. The union would also like to ask the company add a 401k, the union would ask that the company match dollar for dollar what the employees decide to put into their 401k.This will help employees retirement. We would also like to administer an Employee Stock Ownership Program which entitles employees 5 shares of company stock yearly. 3. The union would also like to stick with the current seniority clause that provides for promotions found on length of service and ability. If the company says that promotions are bid for on a departmental basis then the department that has the position open should be available to the candidate within the company that has seniority based on length of service and ability before a junior employee. 4. The union wou ld also like to discuss the current contract about required overtime.The union insists on paying employees time-and-a-half while working these days and insisting that the company use a volunteer method when selecting the employees to work on these days. 5. I think that the union should also place a restriction on the companys right to subcontract. No subcontracting can occur when skilled trades are available to do the work. When the company contemplates contracting out any type of work normally performed by a company employee, it shall inform the President, Chairman, and Grievance Committee and the affected Shop Steward of its intentions prior to making a decision to honor the contract allowing the company to subcontract only if, all of their own own(prenominal) resources have been exhausted. 6. As part of the union, I would also like cheer placing demands on management to allow for a supplementary un occupation benefit program to help dislocated workers.The runner is supplementi ng the unemployment benefits of various state unemployment insurance systems. Second is allowing further income to still unemployed workers after state payments have been exhausted. Without sub pay, laid off workers will start looking for new employment and will most likely be unavailable to return to their original position when an opening occurs. We would also like to remind you that a sub pay clause can catch the attention of the most talented people looking for jobs, people like to work for companies that take care of their employees. Also petition management to supplement the union employees unemployment benefits (while laid off through no fault of their own) and allow for up to 90% of their original pay for a maximum of 52 weeks. 7. I would like to recommend the union demand the removal of the no-strike clause because grievance procedures in some cases seem to not work like they should. I believe a strike or slowdown might help persuade management that something needs to cha nge.8. The union would also like an annual wage increase for all workers along with adjusting the escalator clause in the current contract. The current contract provides for a $.03 increase in reward for each .4-point increase in the Consumer Price Index (CPI). We as the union ask that the company provides a $0.10 increase in wages for each 0.5-point increase in the CPI. I feel these demands were adequate for negotiations because these demands will benefit our employees and fix the problems that are going on at the plant. Although not all were agreed on the only demand that didnt even get a second look would be adding a supplemental unemployment benefits for dislocated workers. Which I understand this is delinquent to armored personnel carriers current costs due to the current loan the company has just borrowed.The Bargaining ZoneGoing into this negotiation the union, in all, knew that APC would try and change the medical benefits for their employees. Our demand states that we we rent going to accept any change to the medical benefits but our plan was to ask for this and conduct in permitting the company to only pay 80% of medical costs throughout the new contract. Management and the union chairperson, Ziaria, agreed that the company pay for 65% of medical costs throughout the course of the new contract. Our final result was close to what we were original to in the first place so Id say we pure(a) what we wanted in the bargaining order for this demand. Another demand in which we knew that management would counter on would be the current No-Strike Clause in the current contract. The union requested that this clause be removed and management wouldnt accept this claiming Auto Product Corporation is a production company.Feasibly, we are not able to produce the volumes of quality move for our vendors when the company is being disrupted with strikes and work slowdowns. Our Local unions file grievances for their members and they go through the process. The cont ract contains a standard grievance procedure and provide for arbitration for all disputes arising under the contract. The company, with the help of its 3800 employees wants to remain full of life to the community, vendors and families of our employees we can only be effective, if we are producing quality parts. But, the entire time, the union knew this wasnt going to work and Paul had mentioned a No-Sue section to be added which management had no problem with. Our bargaining limits on this were accomplished with ease considering management said they had no problem adding this as long as the union was not directly involved or instigating a strike or slowdown.The Negotiation ProcessOverall I would have to say that the negotiation process was somewhat difficult in the beginning because management was restless with our demands refusing pretty much all of them. I feel like the union was more willing to transact but that could be because our goal was the employees and the managements g oal was reducing costs. For example, the union and management went back and forth on decreasing the amount of stewards to job families, trying to reduce stewards from having 60 to 20 and decreasing the amount of time they have to do grievance work daily. The union and management also went back and forth on non-productive time. Management wanted employees to clock out for lunch and then only have a 5 minute paid wash up at the end of their shift. The union agreed on measure out for lunch but wanted to keep the 10 minute wash up and management wouldnt accept this until the very end of negotiations. Besides these two matters, the negotiation process went rather smoothly.My personal thoughtsThere are things that I wish would have went differently. For example, my teammates shouldve contributed more to discussions. I feel as though I was constantly waiting on a response from them and more than half the time I would only hear from Paul and as I discussed earlier he would respond mainly w ith I agree which gives me no other viewpoints or if I should have done things differently. Or, the would respond after deadlines to where I couldnt change anything. Then, Ziaria, not being in hardly any of our discussions goes in the boardroom and conducts negotiations without even consulting with me or Paul. I understand though that you cant al bearings choose your teammates.Conclusion onwards conducting these negotiations I went into this thinking I wanted to be on a management team because I have always had this view of unions being dramatic. Instead, my views now are more pro-union because this negotiation has taught me that unions are there for your rights as an employee. When management tries to change the contract, you as an employee, should want the union there to try and get the outstrip possible outcomes for all employees because management is just going to try and cut costs any way they can. Overall I found this project to be interesting and informative on the things th at actual companies negotiate on.ReferencesThe Mock Negotiation Problem. Sloane, Arthur A., Witney, Fred. Labor Relations. Prentice Hall- Pearson Education, 2012. 435-440. Work Rights Press. How to Win Past Practice Grievances. n.d. 16 November 2012 .